|
Post by hk47fan on Feb 6, 2007 22:12:45 GMT -5
Okay, just a minute ago this crossed my mind, we don't know too much about Revan's time as Sith Lord before Malak betrayed him and he was captured by Bastila, but Malak acts like Revan was a horrible and pitiful Dark Lord of the Sith.
So, do you agree with Malak? I didn't think he was pitiful....just tactful and thought more about battles, strategies, the whole war, before rushing into battle or some mission like Malak and others did.
Kreia says in K2 that Revan was life and power. Now, if he was life and power than why was he so pitiful?
I think why Malak didn't have a very high opinion on him in K1. Since Malak seemed like normal Sith, he probably thought of Revan as weak by all of his actions.
Another thing that shows that Revan is tactful and a unique Sith Lord is that if you take the DS route on K1, you learn in K2 he just shut down the Star Forge and ran off to get a more powerful Empire.
What are your opinions on this, Kotorians?
|
|
|
Post by darthnotrevan on Feb 6, 2007 22:46:21 GMT -5
Pitiful? Nah. Careful about his actions? Yeah. I'm thinking that it was Malak's underestimation of Darth Revan or Jedi Revan that lead to his demise. If Malak would have been more careful IMHO things might not have turned out the way that they did. In the words of a dying Malak V.S. LS Revan-
"I could not have immagined what would have happened if our roles were reversed. Would I been redeemed as you were?"
Hey that gives me a fic idea. But that's off-topic. In other words, IMO, Revan was not pitiful but rather more thought out and careful. That's my two cents anyway...
|
|